Archive for March, 2009

Use A Popular Font

Fonts

Every quarter, UC’s Design Communication classes begin with a portfolio review. When I teach the class, I encourage students to use a grid, keep it simple, get feedback. When it comes to font selection, I urge people to stick to the classics.

This post from Instantshift highlights the 21 most used fonts by professional designers. It’s a good list with some usual suspects and some surprises, at least to me. Check it out next time you want to try a little something different. Papyrus somehow did not make the list.

Thanks to @cinnamonflower for the tip!

Tags:

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 Links 1 Comment

Consultants: Up To Eleven

spinal tap

A few years ago, I once asked a friend for some insight as to why his company had been so consistently successful. He said, “We always overdeliver.”

Photographer Chase Jarvis just posted a similar piece of advice on his blog:

In my experience, the art director, creative director, the photo editor people–whoever are that people that hire you to create pictures–are exactly the same. If you continue to deliver the expected and nothing new, they get bored. Sure they’re safe in part – it’s why they have a job – but they’re perhaps a little bored. And they might be bored by you. And in the creative world, boredom equals death.

I’m glad Chase reminded me of this (and to Finn McKenty for sending it along). It’s easy to get caught up in meeting expectations, especially for your biggest clients. The truth is your best clients want you to exceed expectations, and they deserve it more than anyone else.

So if you’re planning to push for your new clients, and you need to push for your existing clients, then it simply adds up: always overdeliver.

Tags:

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 Ideas 1 Comment

The Devil is in the Details

Why does a MacBook feel so sensual while other laptops lack the same emotion? They’re basically the same rounded box, right? The devil is in the details.

Joshua Maruska Demo

This post continues my recent interest in how form communicates meaning. First, Gray Holland wrote about how surfaces can communicate meaning, now Joshua Maruska gets into the details of how to actually do it. Joshua does a nice demo for Alias on how to make a simple, rounded square into a high quality set of surfaces: something that looks geometric, but feels organic.

This approach isn’t always necessary, but we designers need to be aware of when these details matter and when they don’t. For a piece of consumer electronics (where aesthetics are critical), it definitely does.

Check out the rest of the article, Devil in the Details, highly recommended for anyone who knows Alias well but wants to step up their craft.

Tags: , ,

Monday, March 30th, 2009 Aesthetics, Implementations 2 Comments

Thoughts on Auto Design Strategy, Interview with Drew Smith, Part 2

Drew Smith is an automotive design strategist and journalist. He offers a refreshing take on car design with his blog DownsideUpDesign. Strategic Aesthetics interviewed Drew to get a better understanding of the transportation design from a strategic point of view. If you missed part one of the interview, check it out here.

Designers are taught to be pretty tactical, what advice do you have for those of us trying be more strategic?

Broaden your perspective! Tactical design is, for me, “doing something right” while strategic design is “doing the right thing.” Doing something right is relatively easy as you just need to focus on the task at hand, no more. Doing the right thing requires a designer to be acutely aware of the future into which they are placing their product and recognizing that their product can be a catalyst for change. To that end, designers need to be feeding themselves on what the future will (and could be) like, both from a broad social and cultural perspective, and also from the perspective of production methods and technology. Too often I hear of automotive designers reading design magazines, which deal with stuff that’s already here or very close to it, doing a Google image search, whacking together a mood board and getting down to work designing the future. It’s the same approach that a lot of us took in design school because the course structures didn’t encourage a strongly integrated approach to contextualizing our work with a view to demographics and social and environmental impacts. This approach is too simplistic if designers want their work to be truly significant.

blogosphere viz

My main tool for contextualizing my work is the amazing network of strategic thinking bloggers, people like Seth Godin, Allan Cochinov and Core77, the team over at PSFK, Re*Move and, of course yourself! Vitally, it’s not about just reading these people, it’s about interacting with them, bouncing ideas around and seeing what I can feed back into my own work. My blog is also an important part of this process as it is a public testing ground for what I am thinking. I also try and keep across current affairs at a micro level in the newspapers and, more broadly, in a few magazines. One of my favourites is Monocle for its coverage of emerging global hot-spots, be they political, creative or inspirational. It treads a nice line between feeding the aesthete in me while also providing the brain snacks that get me thinking.
Thanks to Drew for taking the time to answer our questions. For more on him be sure to check out DownsideUpDesign.

Tags: , , ,

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009 Aesthetics, Ideas No Comments

Computers for Emerging Markets: UC x HP

Last week, University of Cincinnati’s College of DAAP held it’s final critiques. Fourth-year industrial design students sponsored by HP created computer concepts for emerging markets in China, Africa, Brazil, Turkey, and India. I was at the critique and thought everything looked really nice. Here are a few photos from the crit. If you have more pics from the crit, leave a link in the comments section!


Carly Hagins

Carly Hagins presents to the legendary Tony Kawanari

Tracy Subisak

Tracy Subisak

Ed Mangum

Ed Mangum

Jacob Nitz

Jacob Nitz

Aaron Ricica

Aaron Ricica

Nick Rudemiller

Nick Rudemiller

Tags: , , ,

Monday, March 23rd, 2009 Aesthetics, Implementations 8 Comments

Thoughts on Auto Design Strategy, Interview with Drew Smith, Part 1

Drew Smith is an automotive design strategist and journalist. He offers a refreshing take on car design with his blog DownsideUpDesign. Strategic Aesthetics interviewed Drew to get a better understanding of the transportation design from a strategic point of view.

Please tell our readers a little bit about yourself. How did you become a transportation design strategist?

I started a PhD looking at the perception of form at Coventry University, one of the two English Ivy Leagues as far as automotive design is concerned, and had come to realize that I would benefit enormously from gaining some experience in the industry. I had a vague notion of design strategy from my days as an Industrial Design student in Sydney, Australia. However, in all the time I was at Coventry, design strategy was never promoted as a career path. I started researching companies that offered these services on a consultancy basis to automotive design studios. After weeks of searching, just one name came up, for a firm located near Frankfurt, Germany. One of my colleagues knew one of the principals pretty well and the introduction was made. I left my jobs as lecturer and senior designer in a small industrial design studio and began working, on a freelance basis, for the company in May 2008.

What is your definition of Strategic Aesthetics?

For me, strategic aesthetics is about recognizing the combined powers of beauty and forward thinking. There are many examples of products and services that have beauty but a poor sense of context, leading to waste and inefficiency. There are fewer examples, but still a significant number, of products and services that nail the context and content, but crucially lack the emotional pull to allow them to capitalize on their, for want of a better term, “goodness.” When you bring aesthetics and strategy together you have the tools to create products that can be catalysts for change, both from an economic standpoint and from a socio-cultural perspective.

What carmaker has the best design strategy? Who is executing their strategy the best?

Audi A6

Putting my personal design taste aside there seems to me to be two companies that are currently doing well with regards to aesthetic strategy. The first is Audi. They have somewhat taken over the mantle that BMW, and to a lesser extent Mercedes, used to hold of producing highly consistent, infallibly well-resolved designs. It’s easy to argue that it’s not a highly visually innovative approach, but it has had an extremely positive impact on their sales figures. They have also stuck with core models and market positioning that build their brand image, rather than detract from it unlike BMW (5 GT, X6) and Mercedes (R-Class, CLC, GL). The premium market place is a highly conservative one and, by and large, premium consumers like a brand that doesn’t rock the boat too much.Taiki sideview

The second is Mazda, a company which I covered recently on DownsideUpDesign. The caveat here is that I’m referring to their Nagare series of concept cars, which as of today, have still not been transferred into production. Mazda set out to achieve a truly unique Japanese sense of premium with these concepts and they achieved it, without question. The real difficulty has arisen when they have tried to translate key design elements into production vehicles and it suggests that either it’s too expensive to do properly or they aren’t trying hard enough! The grille of the new Mazda 3 MPS, for example, is meant to be a direct translation from the Nagare cars into the production realm. Sadly, it just ends up giving the car a rictus grin. No manufacturer in recent memory has spent so much money or, more importantly, design effort on creating such a beautiful series of cars based on a superbly strong design theme. My fear is, however, that if they can’t get really tangible examples into production soon, the effort will have been wasted.Winglet

As far as real design strategy is concerned, which, when it com es to the automotive industry is about looking at ways to solve both issues of long-term sustainability and urban mobility, nobody has really stepped up to the plate with a convincing, visible commitment. Toyota has been playing at the edges for a few years now with their iUnit/iSwing/Winglet concepts and BMW has outlined Project-i which will provide “premium” urban mobility solutions starting in 2015. From where I sit it’s still not enough. Toyota is aping the questionable Segway model, BMW is focusing on too small a customer group and nobody is taking a really hard look at the whole-of-life impact of building and selling new cars.

Mindset
I do think that the automotive industry is at a disadvantage when it comes to strategic design because, traditionally, the product lead times have been so long that it’s a real, but not insurmountable, challenge to project far enough forward to ascertain what will be appropriate for the long term. The counter argument to this, of course, is that the industry has had it’s head stuck in the sand for far too long. This and the fact that the auto makers have developed into monolithic bureaucracies that can’t respond fast enough to change. There are a lot of brilliant minds in the car design community being strangled by the very companies they love. It’s been interesting to watch, over the last couple of years, as high-profile players have started to drift away to found or join start-ups, like Mindset, Fisker and Tesla, that are small, focused and don’t suffer from the burden of history and red tape. I think it’s in these companies that strategic automotive design will really take off.
Check back for the second part of our interview where Drew gives advice on how designers can be more strategic.

Tags: , , ,

Monday, March 23rd, 2009 Aesthetics, Ideas 4 Comments

Open Source Design Process: IDEO + BugLabs

IDEo and Buglabs

IDEO and BugLabs recently collaborated on a conceptual exploration of the BUGbase UI. Unlike most design projects, this was one was open source, with lots of content from throughout the process posted to a blog.

Even though I understand competitive advantage and the need for secrecy, I’ve always hoped designers could find a way to share their ideas. I imagined some “designers code” in which we could help each other for mutual benefit but not share this information outside of our circle. I realize I’m dreaming a little, but this open source design process has got me excited. Any other open source, design process work like this going on that I should know about?

Via Noise Between Stations

Tags: , ,

Monday, March 16th, 2009 Links No Comments

Design Thinking vs. Design Making

Stick Figure

As DAAP defines it, design is made up of two basic components: design thinking and design making. Design thinking requires sharp observation skills, a willingness to learn (and unlearn), sympathetic attitudes, and the ability to work collaboratively. When it comes to design making, one excels by having a strong aesthetic sense, attention to detail, and visualization skills.

(Some designers are great at only one, others are okay at both, and just a few are great at both. Each of these combinations can have value to an organization if leaders know how to use them. But that’s beside the point…)

Historically, design is rooted in the more tactical design making, but design thinking is currently helping designers communicate their strategic value to businesses. Which has more lasting value? In 500 years, will the most valued designers be design thinkers, design makers, or both?

Here’s some food for thought from Dan Saffer, Bruce Nussbaum, Nick Leon, and Tim Leberecht.

Tags: , ,

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 Ideas 1 Comment

Because

I recently met the guys at Open Field Creative at a DAAP alumni gathering. Naturally, I was interested in learning more so I found their website. The work is solid, but I was most impressed by their section titled Because.

Open Field

Open Field’s Because piece is a series of slides that simply answer the question, “Why?” It succeeds in delivering their point of view in a clear, easily digestable format. As ironic as it seems, we design consultants struggle to create a strategic point of view for ourselves, even though we do it every day for our clients. Congrats to the Open Field team for having an opinion and having the confidence to put it out there.

Tags: , ,

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 Links 1 Comment

Godin: The Two Elements of a Great Presenter

  1. Respect (from the audience)
  2. Love (for the audience)

The presenter who loves his audience the most, wins.

In my Design Communication class, students are preparing for their final critique with HP. Seth Godin’s latest post on presenting is perfect timing for them, so I wanted to link to it so they can read through it.

Tags:

Thursday, March 5th, 2009 Links 1 Comment

On Twitter

  • It's cute when people get on board with social media and start sending you articles about it. 1 week ago
  • It's cute when people get on board with social media and start sending you articles about it. 1 week ago
  • Skin crudo with raspberry coulis! 1 week ago
  • Skin crudo with raspberry coulis 1 week ago
  • Like! RT @Behance: Dotted with kaleidoscope images, this flexible planner allows you to "create your own week." http://cot.ag/bzAkW6 1 week ago
  • More updates...

Posting tweet...